Category: Privacy

  • Your Privacy Under Siege

    The government wants Internet firms to store records about you so that it can have them if necessary for an investigation. Should you worry?

    Here is what Ben Franklin said about liberties:

    “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.”

    It still surprises me that so many Americans don't seem to mind that their liberties are being striped slowly but surely.  How do we continue to elect the loudest proponents of security as a reaction to fear. 

    read more | digg story

  • 2.2 million active-duty personnel in VA data theft

    In a new disclosure Tuesday, VA Secretary Jim Nicholson said the agency was mistaken when it said over the weekend that up to 50,000 Navy and National Guard personnel were among the 26.5 million veterans whose names, birthdates and Social Security numbers were stolen on May 3.

    Read More here.

    Apparently, their are Veteran coalition groups who are threatenting to sue but potential damage of this is worth way more than any can get from a lawsuit.

    It demands that the VA fully disclose which military personnel are affected by the data theft and seeks $1,000 in damages to each person — up to $26.5 billion total.

    What blows my mind is why these people would put a database with that kind of data on a laptop and take everywhere with them.

  • A funny musical animation on N.S.A. wiretapping in United States…

    Found this via the very popular and relevant Schneier security blog.  

    It is a funny Flash musical animation, titled “NSA Wiretapping” (will resize your Web browser's window and requires Flash), on United States' wiretapping.

    Tried to put it on digg but somebody beat me too it.

    read more | digg story

  • Delete Search Results: Cover your tracks

    Ever search for something questionable on someone else system and go into a hyperventilation panic when you notice that their computer is retaining the keywords you typed into their search engine?  

     

    You typed in “boobies” on your mom's computer and now the word pops up everytime you type a “B”!!

     

    Perhaps it was your spouses system and your were searching for evidence of pornography.

    Maybe it was your kids computer and you want to make sure they are o.k. mentally.

    Maybe your Internet connection has been down for a while and you’ve had to use your friends system or a public system.

    Whatever the case maybe it is none of my business.  And you don’t want it to be the business of the other who will use the system after you.

     

    Here are two simple techniques to get rid of those bad keywords.

     

    For Window XP “Recently Opened Documents”:

    To delete “my Recent Documents”

    Right – Click on the “Start” button

    Select “Properties”

    On the Start Menu Tab, Select “Customize”

    Select the “Advance Tab”

    Select the “Clear List” button at the bottom.  Don’t worry, it will NOT delete the files.  (Deselect the checkbox if you don’t want the system to track previously opened files)

     

     

    For Windows XP, Internet Explorer:

    In IE, Select “Tools”

    Go to “Internet Option” at the bottom of the Tools list

    Under Temporary Internet Files select “Delete Cookies” and “Delete Files”

    To delete the history of the websites you searched select “Clear History”

  • Play Patriot Act: The Board Game (FREE)

    The board game that brings the thrill of trampling the Constitution right into your home… newly updated for 2006 to include NSA wiretaps and renewal of provisions!

    read more | digg story

    Zoli @ ZoliBlog mentions how the 1998 movie Enemy of the State fits perfectly into 2006 politics.  I agree, Zoli.

    “Those who give up liberty for the sake of security deserve neither liberty nor security.”

    Ben Franklin 

    Write that on a C-note and give it to the Bush administration. 

     

     

  • Feds want Google search records

    ….a federal judge to order Google Inc. to turn over a broad range of material from its closely guarded databases…Nicole Wong, an associate general counsel for Google, said the company will fight the government's effort “vigorously.''

    I am glad that Google is working to protect the privacy of its customers.  I have a feeling that this won't be the last time that government agencies try and get those records.  With the power of the Patriot Act, I'd be surprised if those records have not already been compromised.  Google may have to move to another country to be free from a newly paranoid U.S. government.  It really would be really unfortunately.

    On the flip side Google does allow Orwellian, big brother control in places like China.  Google's only way in China was to OBEY.  Although it is a bit twisted, I feel they did the right thing.  When you go to someone elses country it is only fitting that you comply with their laws no matter how backward they might be, else stay the hell out of their country.

     

    More on Googles Fight for Privacy:

    Google Versus the Total Information Awareness Program.

    read more | digg story

  • Patriot Act set to renew without changes to protect liberties

    Here is a sydicated article from CNET and posted on Inforwars, site from the extremily paranoid Alex Jones, on the Patriot Acts renewal.

    The GOP reached a compromise to offer a 4 year renewal instead of the 7 year Bush wants. The problem is most of the Patriot Act becomes permanent upon being renewed this time and none of the changes requested by citizens were put in. This is bad legislation which goes against the Constitution.

    read more | digg story

  • Securing your Pc with True Crypt

    Tutorial that explains how to encrypt your hard drives with true crypt (freeware) to prevent someone else accessing your files / personal data without your permission.

    read more | digg story

  • Declaration of Independence vs. the Patriot Act

    I got the following Oppinison to Editor (Minneapolis Post) from Schneier's
    blog.  It is about the Patriot Act.  A conservative rants
    agaist the arguement that the Patriot Act is an “erosion of freedom”.

    THE PATRIOT ACT

    Where are the abuses?

    The Nov. 22 commentary “The erosion of freedom” is yet another
    example of how liberal hysteria is conspicuously light on details.

    While the Patriot Act may allow for potential abuses of power, flaws
    undoubtedly to be fine-tuned over time, the “erosion of freedom” it may
    foster absolutely pales in comparison to the freedom it is designed to
    protect in the new age of global terrorism.

    I have yet to read of one incident of infringement of any private
    citizen's rights as a direct result of the Patriot Act — nor does this
    commentary point out any, either.

    While I'm a firm believer in the Fourth Amendment, I also want our
    law enforcement to have the legal tools necessary, unfettered by
    restrictions to counter liberals' paranoid fixation on “fascism,” in
    order to combat the threat that terrorism has on all our freedoms.

    I have enough trust in our free democratic society and the coequal
    branches of government that we won't evolve into a sinister “police
    state,” as ominously predicted by this commentary.

    CHRIS GARDNER, MINNEAPOLIS

    Now read what the brilliant Mr. Bruce Schneir has to say about this peice

    “A simple Googling
    of “patriot act abuses” comes up with almost 3 million hits, many of
    them pretty extensive descriptions of Patriot Act abuses.”

    Some partisan citizens in the U.S. always talk about smaller
    government, yet most of these very same citizens totally support the
    power that the Patriot Act gives to the U.S. government.  I'm not
    saying there is no need for some of the provisions in the Patriot Act
    (like allowing domestic and international agenies to talk) but as
    Americans we should be very leary about an Act that give so much power
    to the government.

    While I don't believe things have spun out of control with a pandemic
    of widespread abuse of the Patriot Act, I do believe we should be very
    suspicious and scrutinizing of this Act and any other seeking to usurp
    our liberty that was won (and continually won) by the blood of true
    patriots throughout the course of America's relatively short
    history.  We can't allow one Act to abolish our inalienable rights.

    Have we forgotten the Declaration of Independence:

    We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are
    created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
    unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit
    of Happiness.

    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed.

    That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
    these Ends, it is in the Right of the People to alter or abolish it,
    and to institute a new Government…

    We must scrutinize any laws
    and/or ACTS that would allow the government to abolish or corrupt our
    rights.  If not, how can we call our selves Americans.  It
    seems that ego and partisan ties have obscured reason to the point of
    political stupidity. 

  • Are you getting email from the FBI or CIA? (new malicious code)

    Dear Sir/Madam, We have logged your IP-address on more than 30 illegal Websites.

    Sober worm pretends to be an email from the FBI or CIA. 

    read more | digg story