ia awareness training

Information Assurance Awareness Training


NIST Special Publication 800-50, is a regulation dedicated to IA Awareness Training



NIST SP 800-5, Building an Information Technology Security Awareness & Training Program


The 800-50 includes guidance on development and sustainment of an awareness & training IT Security (aka information assurance training) program for all users, employees and supervisors within an organization. Having a training program is mandated by the Federal Information Security Act of 2002.

IA Awareness Training – Roles & Responsibilities

Agency heads – must ensure that high priority is given to effective security awareness and training for employees. Appoint a CIO
CIO – Establish overall strategy, funding, tracking and report is in place for the IT security awareness and training program
IT Security Program Manager – tactical deployment, development and maintenance of the IT security & awareness program.
Managers – responsible for complying with IT security awareness program. Work with CIO and IT Security Program Managers to share responsibility. Ensure all users are trained to fulfill their security roles before access is giving. Promote professional development and certification of the IT staff.
Users – largest audience in any organization and are the single most important group of people who can help to reduce unintentional errors.


800-50 calls learning a “continuum”. The continuum of learning starts awareness and builds into education.
Awareness – awareness is not training. Awareness focuses on security concerns to ensure users are mindful of basic rules and issues in a given environment.


Awareness is not training. The purpose of awareness presentations is simply to focus attention on security. Awareness presentations are intended to allow individuals to recognize IT security concerns and respond accordingly. – 800-50

Training – is a formal focused method to develop a skill for job performance.
Training strives to produce relevant and needed security skills and competencies – 800-50


Education – combines multidisciplinary areas into a common body of knowledge.



Education integrates all of the security skills and competencies of the various functional specialties into a common body of knowledge . . . and strives to produce IT security specialists and professionals capable of vision and pro-active response. –800-50

Training & Certification: Risk Management Approach to Security Authorization

Understand the Risk Management Approach to Security Authorization

The concept of management of information security risks across an enterprise is discussed in 800-39. An organization takes a multitier approach to the risk management at the organizational, mission, and system levels. Risk management framework is a process that is broken down in NIST 800-37, Risk Management Framework. The CAP addresses the following:

    Distinguish between applying risk management principles and satisfying compliance requirements
    Identify and maintain information systems inventory
    Understand the criticality of securing information
    Understand organizational operations

Distinguish between applying risk management principles and satisfying compliance
Risk management includes satisfying compliance. Even though some controls may not be able to be made fully compliant due to limited resources, residual risk to the organization can still be mitigated and managed. – Concepts of NIST SP 800-37, Guide of RMF

Identifying and maintaining information system (IS) inventory is addressed in NIST 800-37, Risk Management Framework, 800-18, System Security Plan & 800-64, System Development Life Cycle. 800-37 addresses inventory of the IS in RMF Step 1 – Categorization of IS. Of the tasks of categorization includes information system registration which begins with by identifying the information system in the system inventory. This is documented in the security plan. NIST SP 800-18 discusses how the inventory is documents, and logically separates the system authorization boundary. That inventory is maintained and monitored throughout the life cycle of the IS (from imitation to disposal and from categorization to monitoring of the system).

A CAP candidate can understand the criticality of security information from reading FIPS 199, categorization of federal information systems.

Understanding the organizational operations of the system is imperative to a CAP candidate for the purpose of scope guidance described in NIST SP 800-53.

Risk Management in IT: NSS

Risk Management of IT: National Security Systems

Risk Assessments and Risk Management will apply to National Security Systems (NSS).

What is a Risk Assessment?

A risk assessment is the results/process to determine the likelihood that a threat will exploit a weakness. Risk assessment is a part of the risk management.

What is risk management?

Risk Management is the on-going process of determining assessing, identifying and prioritizing of risks.

Is My System a National Security System?

NIST SP 800-59, Guidance for Identifying an information system as an NSS. 800-39 is a 17 page document developed in conjunction with the Department of Defense, including the National Security Agency, for identifying an information system as a national security system. It is basised on the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA).

Who determines if you have an NSS?

The head of each agency is responsible for designating an agency information security official to determine which, if any, agency systems are national security systems.

Tools to determine if you have a NSS system:

National Security System Identification Checklist (NIST SP 800-59, Appendix A). The NSS ID Checklist asks (6) questions. Answering yes to any of these questions qualifies your system as an NSS:
• Does the function, operation, or use of the system involve intelligence activities?
• Does the function, operation, or use of the system involve cryptologic activities related to national security?
• Does the function, operation, or use of the system involve command and control of military forces?
• Does the function, operation, or use of the system involve equipment that is an integral part of a weapon or weapons system?
• Is the system critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions?
• Does the system store, process, or communicate classified information?

NSS RMF
The guidance of CNSSI 1253 is the result of NIST collaborated with the Intelligence Community (IC), Department of Defense (DoD), and the Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) to ensure NIST SP 800-53 contains security controls to meet the requirements of National Security Systems (NSS).

KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CNSS INSTRUCTION NO. 1253 AND NIST PUBLICATIONS

The key differences between CNSSI 1253 and the rest of the NIST publications is that NSS systems do not follow “high-water mark”, NSS maybe tailored through risk-based adjustment, control profiles, and a method that allows organization to practice reciprocity.

NSS and High Water Mark
Both FIPS 200 and NIST 800-53 apply the concept of a high-water mark (HWM) when categorizing information systems according to the worst-case potential impact of a loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information or an information system. This Instruction does not adopt this HWM usage. In the National Security Community, the potential impact levels determined for confidentiality, integrity, and availability are retained, meaning there are 27 possible three-value combinations for NSI or NSS, as opposed to the three possible single-value categorizations obtained using the guidelines in FIPS 200. – CNSSI 1253

Risk-Based Adjustment
Potential impact-based security categorizations for NSS may be tailored through the use of a risk-based adjustment. This adjustment takes into consideration the physical and personnel security measures already employed throughout the National Security Community and factors such as aggregation of information.

Control Profile
Method by which organizations may designate sets of controls for NSS based on their enterprise-wide risk assessment and taking into account business objectives, system risks, and mission needs.

NSS Reciprocity
It is the policy of the National Security Community that member organizations practice reciprocity with respect to the certification of systems and system components to the greatest extent practicable. Reciprocity of certification reduces the cost and time to implement systems and system components.

Risk Management in IT: SDLC

Risk Management Guide for IT: SDLC

NIST 800-30, risk management guide for IT discusses how risk management framework matches to the system development life cycle (SDLC) , risk assessment methodology, risk mitigation, and good practice of ongoing risk assessment.

A system and its information must be protected from cradle to grave. That is why risk management applies to the entire system development life cycle. The level of risk to the system and its data depends on the criticality or importance of the system to the business and/or mission it supports.
The system development life cycle consists of: Initiation, Development/Acquisition, Implementation, Maintenance/Operations, and Disposal.

How Risk Management Framework matches to the System Development Life Cycle

SDLC
Phases

Phase
Characteristics

Support
from Risk Management Activities

Phase
1—Initiation

The need
for an IT system is

expressed
and the purpose and

scope of
the IT system is

documented

Identified
risks are used to

support
the development of the

system
requirements, including

security
requirements, and a

security
concept of operations

(strategy)

Phase
2—Development or

Acquisition

The IT
system is designed,

purchased,
programmed,

developed,
or otherwise

constructed

The risks
identified during this

phase can
be used to support

the
security analyses of the IT

system
that may lead to

architecture
and design tradeoffs

during
system

development

Phase
3—Implementation

The system
security features

should be
configured, enabled,

tested,
and verified

The risk
management process

supports
the assessment of the

system
implementation against

its
requirements and within its

modeled
operational

environment.
Decisions

regarding
risks identified must

be made
prior to system

operation

Phase
4—Operation or

Maintenance

The system
performs its

functions.
Typically the system is

being
modified on an ongoing

basis
through the addition of

hardware
and software and by

changes to
organizational

processes,
policies, and

procedures

Risk
management activities are

performed
for periodic system

reauthorization
(or

reaccreditation)
or whenever

major
changes are made to an

IT system
in its operational,

production
environment (e.g.,

new system
interfaces)

Phase
5—Disposal

This phase
may involve the

disposition
of information,

hardware,
and software.

Activities
may include moving,

archiving,
discarding, or

destroying
information and

sanitizing
the hardware and

software

Risk
management activities

are
performed for system

components
that will be

disposed
of or replaced to

ensure
that the hardware and

software
are properly disposed

of, that
residual data is

appropriately
handled, and that

system
migration is conducted

in a
secure and systematic

manner

Training and Certification: NIST SP 800-39 Manage Information Security Risk

NIST SP 800-39, Manage Information Security Risk

NIST 800-39 is a federal document that talks about risk management of information system and their security. It is cited as one of the sources for the ISC2 Certified Authorization Professional (CAP) certification. For study of the document go to Chapters 2 and 3 of 800-39. Chapter 2 talks about the fundamentals of risk management & chapter 3 breaks down the process of applying risk management across and organization.

The Fundamentals of Risk Management (Chapter 2, 800-39)
800-39 goes into the philosophy (or “the why”) and the how of managing information security at multiple levels (or multitier risk management approach). The three layers (or tiers) of risk management addressed in the 800-39 are:
Tier 1: Organization level
Tier 2: Mission/Business Process level
Tier 3: Information System level

Tier 1: Organization Level risk management
Tier one addresses security from the organizations perspective. The activities include the implementation of the first component of risk management, risk framing. Risk framing provides context of all the risk activities within an organization, which affects the risk activities of tier 1 & 2. The output of risk framing is Risk Management Strategy. In tier 1 the organization establishes and implements governance structure that are in compliance with laws, regulations and policies. Tier 1 activities include establishment of the Risk Executive Function, establishment of the risk management strategy and determination of the risk tolerance.

Tier 2: Mission/Business Process Level risk management

Tier 2 risk management activities include: 1) defining the mission/business processes to support the organization. 2) Prioritize the mission/business process with respect to the long term goals of the organization. 3) Define the type of information needed to successfully execute the mission/business processes, criticality/sensitivity of the information and the information flows both internal and external of the information.

Having a risk-aware process is an important part of tier 2. To be risk-aware senior leaders/executives need to know: 1) types of threat sources and threat events that could have an adverse affect the ability of the organizations 2) the potential adverse impacts on the organizational operations and assets, individuals, the Nation if confidentiality, integrity, availability is compromised 3) the organization’s resilience to such an attack that can be achieved with a given mission/business process

Tier 3: Information System risk management

From the information system perspective, tier 3 addresses the following tasks:
1) Categorization of the information system
2) Allocating the organizational security control
3) Selection, implementation, assessment, authorization, and ongoing

Chapter 3 focuses on the step to have a comprehensive risk management program. The tasks discussed include:
Risk Framing
Risk Assessing
Risk Response
Risk Monitoring

Risk Framing
Risk framing are the assumptions, constraints, risk tolerance and priorities that shape an organization’s managing risk. Risk framing is created based on organizational governance structure, how much money is available, regulations imposed, environment, culture and trust relationships.
In order to “frame” risk (or get an organizational context of the risk) the organization must determine: Risk assumptions, risk constraints, risk tolerance and priorities/trade-offs

Risk Assumptions
Risk assumption has to do determining how to risk will be assessed for an organization. Assumptions are based on identification of threats, vulnerabilities, the impact to the organization if attacks are successful and likelihood of attacks.

Risk Constraints
Risk constraints have to do with accepted limits of risk assessments, risk monitoring & risk response. Those limitation might be financial, cultural, the need to rely on legacy systems, or regulations imposed on the organization.

Risk Tolerance
Risk tolerance is how much risk the organization is willing to take.
Priorities/Tradeoffs
Risk is experienced at different levels, in different forms, and in different time frames. At Tier
1, organizations make trade-offs among and establish priorities for responding to such risks. Organizations tend to have multiple priorities that at times conflict, which generates potential risk. Approaches employed by organizations for managing portfolios of risks reflect organizational culture, risk tolerance, as well as risk-related assumptions and constraints. These approaches are typically embodied in the strategic plans, policies, and roadmaps of organizations which may indicate preferences for different forms of risk response. For example, organizations may be willing to accept short-term risk of slightly degraded operations to achieve long-term reduction in information security risk.
However, this trade-off could be unacceptable for one particularly critical mission/business function (e.g., real-time requirements in many industrial/process control systems). For that high-priority area, a different approach to improving security may be required including the application of compensating security controls.

Risk Assessment
Risk assessment is threat & vulnerability identification and risk determination. Organizaitonal risk framing is a prerequisite to risk assessments, because methods of risk assessment must be established by the contexts of the organizations risk.

Risk Response
Risk response identifies, evaluates, decides on, and implements appropriate courses of action to
accept, avoid, mitigate, share, or transfer risk to organizational operations and assets, individuals,
other organizations, and the Nation, resulting from the operation and use of information systems.

Risk identification is key to risk response. Risk types include:
Risk accept- is the appropriate risk response when the identified risk is within the organizational risk tolerance. Organizations can accept risk deemed to be low, moderate, or high depending on particular situations or conditions.

Risk avoidance– Organizations may conduct certain types of activities or employ certain types of information technologies that result in risk that is unacceptable. In such situations, risk avoidance involves taking specific actions to eliminate the activities or technologies that are the basis for the risk or to revise or reposition these activities or technologies in the organizational mission/business processes to avoid the potential for unacceptable risk.

Risk mitigation-adding management, technical, administrative safeguards to minimize identified risks to the system.
Risk share & transfer- Risk sharing or risk transfer is the appropriate risk response when organizations desire and have the means to shift risk liability and responsibility to other organizations. Risk transfer shifts the entire risk responsibility or liability from one organization to another organization (e.g., using insurance to transfer risk from particular organizations to insurance
companies).

Risk Monitoring – Risk changes with each modification of the system. It’s important to monitor the changes of the risk of a system. Changes to threats can also change risk.

Training & Certification: CAP – Security Authorization of Federal Information Systems

Understanding the Security Authorization of federal information systems

The ISC2 CAP candidate needs to understand the multitier approach to evaluating strategic & tactical risk across an organization/enterprise. This is discussed thoroughly in NIST SP 800-39, Managing Information Security Risk. 800-39 explains risk management from the organization, mission, and system perspective.

800-39 explains how and organization does risk framing by making risk assumptions, knowing risk constraints, risk tolerance, priorities & tradeoffs. Implementation of an organization’s risk management strategy is also based it’s governance structure.

Security Authorization is a risk management process that based on identification of threats, vulnerabilities and countermeasures. 800-39 and 800-37 explains what must be included in a risk assessments that will evaluated residual risks and determine if they are acceptable or unacceptable to the organization as whole. Unacceptable risks can be reduced by implementing security controls.

Understanding the Security Authorization of federal information systems covers the following key areas:

Understand the Risk Management Approach to Security Authorization
Understanding and distinguishing among the Risk Management Framework (RMF) steps
Define and Understand Roles & Responsibilities
Understand the Relationship between the RMF and SDLC
Understand Legal, Regulatory, and Other Requirements for Security Authorization
Understand Common Controls and Security Control Inheritance
Understand Ongoing Monitoring Strategies
Understand How the Security Authorization Process Relates to:

1. Organization-wide risk management
2. System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
3. Information system boundaries
4. Authorization decisions

Training and Certification: certified authorization professional (1)

The Certified Authorization Professional (CAP) is a certification that indicates a professional level of knowledge/skill on the subject of federal information system authorization (formerly certification & accreditation). In the US federal government, “Authorization” to operate a federally owned information system is a formal acceptance of risk from an Authorization Officer (AO). An AO is a high ranking official granted the authority to make major risk related decisions for an entire branch/or unit within a federal organization. The AO accepts or rejects the risks that information systems poses to his or her organization based on the recommendations of a security control assessors audit and accompanied Security Authorization Package.

The CAP is based almost entirely on federal information security/protection laws, National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST), and Office of Management & Budget regulations.

There are seven domains the CAP exam focuses on:
1. Understanding the Security Authorization of Information Systems
2. Categorize Information Systems
3. Establish the Security Control Baseline
4. Apply Security Controls
5. Assess Security Controls
6. Authorize Information System
7. Monitor Security Controls

NIST 800: DoD Risk Management Framework

There are a couple defense policy reflecting the DoD’s move to NIST 800 standards: Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS 2011-D039) & CJCSI 6510.01, Information Assurance and Support to Computer Network Defense

Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS 2011-D039)
Defense contractors will have to meet the NIST Special Publication 800-53 security controls. Most large defense contractor have already started meeting defense controls for DIACAP (which are very similar to NIST 800 controls).
more info @ firegovernment IT

CJCSI 6510.01, Information Assurance and Support to Computer Network Defense
The new 6510.01F replaces the old 6510.01E. The document refers to changes in the name of the Information Assurance Manager (IAM) to Information System Security Manager (ISSM) and the Information Assurance Officer (IAO) to Information System Security Officer (ISSO). The name Designated Accreditation Authority (DAA) is changed to Authorizing Official (AO). The former DIACAP term “certification” is changed to 800-37 term “assessment”.

Updates titles for Designated Accrediting Authority (DAA) to Authorizing Official; Information Assurance Manager (lAM) to Information Systems Security Manager (ISSM); and Information Assurance Officer (IAO) to Information Systems Security Officer (ISSO) to align with CNSSI No. 4009 (reference e) terms. Replaces term certification with assessment and accreditation with authorization (to operate) in alignment with CNSSI No. 4009 (reference e) terminology. The new terms are followed by legacy terms in parentheses throughout instruction.

The document also refers to the coming changes to DoD 8500 policies. The changes will focus on NIST 800:

Select security controls lAW DODI 8500.2 (reference g). Note: The next update to DODI 8500.2 (reference g) and DODI 8510.01 (reference i) will direct DOD IS categorization and security control selection lAW CNSSI No. 1253, “Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems” (reference ill) with additional specific guidance on the DIACAP Knowledge Service. DODI 8500.2 (reference g) and DODI 8510.01 (reference i) will also direct the use of security controls in NIST SP 800-53, “Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations” (reference kkk) with supporting validation procedures in NIST SP 800-53A, “Guide for Assessing the Security Controls in Federal Information Systems and Organizations” (reference 111), and additional DOD guidance published in the DIACAP Knowledge Service.

The ultimate goal will be to move away from “Certification & Accreditation” and to a Risk Management Framework” as in NIST SP 800-37:

NIST 800-37 SP, “Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems” (reference mmmmm), provides guidelines for applying the Risk Management Framework to include conducting the activities of security categorization, security control selection and implementation, security control assessment, information system authorization, and security control monitoring.

DIARMF

Department of Defense Information Assurance Risk Management Framework (DIARMF) will replace the DoD’s DIACAP process. As of Mar 2011 it is still being developed. The former DoD Information Assurance Certification & Accreditation Process (DIACAP) will undergo the same change as the NIST SP 800-37, C&A guide did when it changed to the rev 1, Guide for Applying Risk Management Framework. Some of the changes from DIACAP to DIARMF will consist of:

    NIST SP 800-53 controls
    Change focus from C&A to Risk Management
    Definition of how to bridge between DoD systems and NIST defined system (subsystems & Platform IT for example)
    DIARMF will look more like NIST 800-37 rev 1

It is unknown how DIARMF authorization packages will look. Currently, the DIACAP consist of DIACAP packages (DIP, SIP, scorecard, POA&M with artifacts) and NIST 800-37 rev 1 consists of a Security Authorization Package (System Security Plan, Security Assessment Report & POA&M). Also, the roles between the NIST Risk Management Framework and the DoD 8500 series are different. So far, the DON CIO and ASD (NII) have come up with mapping between the roles and the 800-53 controls.

The DIARMF will hopefully cover all of the gaps between the DoD C&A process and the new NIST 800-37, Risk Management Framework.

1 2