<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>security blog &#187; Certification/Security+/Basic Cryptography/Crypto Algor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elamb.org/category/certificationsecuritybasic-cryptographycrypto-algorithms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elamb.org</link>
	<description>don&#039;t be sheeple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Scientists launch new, &#8216;unbreakable&#8217; encryption system</title>
		<link>http://elamb.org/scientists-launch-new-unbreakable-encryption-system/</link>
		<comments>http://elamb.org/scientists-launch-new-unbreakable-encryption-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Certification/Security+/Basic Cryptography/Crypto Algor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum key distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category></category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elamb.org/scientists-launch-new-unbreakable-encryption-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new encryption system, which its creators say is unbreakable, got its first test run Wednesday in Vienna, scientists from the European Union project SECOQC announced.
digg user kinthiri explains:
Quantum cryptography is unbreakable because if any 3rd party views it that does not have the credentials and is not the intended recipient, the simple viewing of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new encryption system, which its creators say is unbreakable, got its first test run Wednesday in Vienna, scientists from the European Union project SECOQC announced.</p>
<p><strong>digg user kinthiri explains:</strong><br />
Quantum cryptography is unbreakable because if any 3rd party views it that does not have the credentials and is not the intended recipient, the simple viewing of the encrypted data by that third party changes that data such that even the intended recipient can&#8217;t decrypt it. Thus they know that there is a 3rd party viewing the stream. Effectively the data self destructs if anyone attempts to intercept it or decrypt it. This is not a new phenomenon.</p>
<p>What is new is that its being used commercially. It had previously been used experimentally by the military in association with researchers, but this is the first time its been brought to life outside test environments and is available commercially.</p>
<p>The nature of quantum mechanics makes this truly unbreakable. You couldn&#8217;t even factor this using your own quantum computer, if you could even get one with enough qbits.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news142677178.html">read more</a> | <a href="http://digg.com/security/Scientists_launch_new_unbreakable_encryption_system">digg story</a></p>
<img src="http://elamb.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1357&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elamb.org/scientists-launch-new-unbreakable-encryption-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quantum Key Distributions (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://elamb.org/quantum-key-distributions-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://elamb.org/quantum-key-distributions-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb.security</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Certification/Security+/Basic Cryptography/Crypto Algor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum key distribution]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>quantum</category>
	<category>teleportation</category>
	<category>brain</category>
	<category>3acfac15b16fec60</category>
	<category>99df</category>
	<category>colid</category>
	<category>onearticle</category>
	<category>techreport</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elamb.org/quantum-key-distributions-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NIST has an page that talks about Quantum Key Distribution:
Quantum encryption systems use lasers to generate individual pulses of light called photons. Each photon is sent in one of two modes, either vertical/horizontal, or plus 45 degrees/minus 45 degrees. Within each mode, one orientation represents the digital value 0, and the other represents the digital [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">The NIST has an page that talks about Quantum Key Distribution:</font></font></p>
<blockquote><p><font face="Arial" size="2">Quantum encryption systems use lasers to generate individual pulses of light called photons. Each photon is sent in one of two modes, either vertical/horizontal, or plus 45 degrees/minus 45 degrees. Within each mode, one orientation represents the digital value 0, and the other represents the digital value 1. To visualize how this works, imagine that each photon is a tiny envelope moving perpendicular to the ground (vertical=1), parallel to the ground (horizontal=0), tilted at 45 degrees to the right (plus 45 degrees =1) or tilted 45 degrees to the left (minus 45 degrees=0). <a href="http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/quantumkeys_background.htm">NIST</a></font> </p></blockquote>
<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New" /></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">Its almost scary how much has been done in relatively so little time in the &#8220;Information Age&#8221; and its only just the beginning.  <br />
</font></font><font face="Courier New" size="2"> </font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">The possibilities are unimaginable.  I thought it was a bit extreme when I read an Author C. Clarke sci-fi novel called, Light of Other Days in which people can send messages directly from brain to brain (some sort of brain to brain Internet) via a device that sends messages on a subatomic level.  Now it doesn’t sound so strange anymore (well, ok, its still strange but it seem possible now).<br />
</font></font><font face="Courier New" size="2"> </font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">Here are some mind blowing articles about quantum entanglement:<br />
</font></font><font face="Courier New" size="2"> </font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">Quantum Teleportation of data (actually it’s the instantaneous transfer of quantum states, but teleportation sounds cooler)<br />
</font></font><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">      The thing is that it has already being done:<br />
</font></font><font face="Courier New" size="2">      </font><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/08/0818_040818_teleportation.html"><font face="Courier New" size="2">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/08/0818_040818_teleportation.html</font></a><br />
<font face="Courier New" size="2">      </font><a href="http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/teleportation/"><font face="Courier New" size="2">http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/teleportation/</font></a><br />
<font face="Courier New" size="2">      </font><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&#038;articleID=ABBA5449-E7F2-99DF-3ACFAC15B16FEC60&#038;colID=30"><font face="Courier New" size="2">http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&#038;articleID=ABBA5449-E7F2-99DF-3ACFAC15B16FEC60&#038;colID=30</font></a><br />
<font face="Courier New" size="2">      </font><a href="http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/12870"><font face="Courier New" size="2">http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/12870</font></a><br />
<font face="Courier New" size="2"> </font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">Quantum Entanglement as an explanation for so called psychic phenomenon:<br />
</font></font><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">      Highly controversial as parapsychology is the &#8220;leprosy&#8221; of<br />
</font></font><font size="2"><font face="Courier New">      science.  Just a hypothesis but interesting:<br />
</font></font><font face="Courier New" size="2">      </font><a href="http://www.deanradin.com/NewWeb/EMblurbs.html"><font face="Courier New" size="2">http://www.deanradin.com/NewWeb/EMblurbs.html</font></a></p>
<p class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/qkd" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'qkd'." rel="tag">qkd</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/quantum" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'quantum'." rel="tag">quantum</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/key" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'key'." rel="tag">key</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/distribution" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'distribution'." rel="tag">distribution</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/crypto" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'crypto'." rel="tag">crypto</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/cryptography" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'cryptography'." rel="tag">cryptography</a></p><img src="http://elamb.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=941&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elamb.org/quantum-key-distributions-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Certifications: DoD 8570</title>
		<link>http://elamb.org/security-certifications-dod-8570/</link>
		<comments>http://elamb.org/security-certifications-dod-8570/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb.security</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification/CISSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification/Security+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification/Security+/Basic Cryptography/Crypto Algor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Digg]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>8570</category>
	<category>gsec</category>
	<category>of</category>
	<category>ground</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>top</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>edge</category>
	<category>cisa</category>
	<category>fissea</category>
	<category>infoseccerts</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elamb.org/security-certifications-dod-8570/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ For Government workers doing any kind of computer security/information assurance, the new regulation, DOD 8570 is a very important document.
DOD 8570, Information Assurance Training, Certification and Workforce Management, requires that all government workers (active duty, govt civilian and contractors) doing security work have a security certification.   The DoD is really trying to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"> </font>For Government workers doing any kind of computer security/information assurance, the new regulation, DOD 8570 is a very important document.</p>
<p><a title="Dod 8570 FAQ" href="http://elamb.org/iase.disa.mil/8570FAQAug05FINAL.doc">DOD 8570, Information Assurance Training, Certification and Workforce Management</a>, requires that all government workers (active duty, govt civilian and contractors) doing security work have a security certification.   The DoD is really trying to crack down on security.</p>
<p>Among the top security certification that you can get are the CISSP and the CISA</p>
<p><img width="386" height="272" src="http://elamb.org/Image1.gif" /></p>
<p>Getting the top certs and then further specializing could give you the edge. For example, CISSP with an CISA (auditor) would cover a lot of ground as would a CISA and an IDS/C&#038;A/Architecture specialists. It would really kick ass to cover ALL ground. This would not be difficult. Not sure if each specialization would require further certifications.</p>
<p><strong>Cost, Renown, Difficulty Comparisons:</strong><strong><a href="http://dmiessler.com/writing/infoseccerts/"><u><font size="2" color="#0000ff">http://dmiessler.com/writing/infoseccerts/</font></u></a></strong></p>
<p><font size="2">Includes: GSEC, CISSP, CISA</font><font size="2"><em>*note: GSEC is $800 and difficult</em></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><strong>Security Certs and their levels according to 8570:</strong><strong><a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2006/01/dod-directive-8570.html"><u><font size="2" color="#0000ff">http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2006/01/dod-directive-8570.html</font></u></a></strong></font></p>
<p><font size="2">Tech level I-III &#038; Management Level I-III</font><font size="2"><em>*note: GSEC is Tech level II</em></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2"><strong>Future Areas of IA Certification:</strong></font><font size="2"><strong /></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2"><strong> </strong></font></font></font></p>
<blockquote><p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2">Certification and Accreditation</font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2">IDS and Analysts</font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2">Auditors</font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2">CND/SP members</font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2">IA architectures, engineers</font></font></font></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://csrc.nist.gov/organizations/fissea/conference/2006/Bieber-Brief-FISSEA2006.pdf#search=%22areas%20of%20ia%20certifications%208570%22">NIST Slide on 8570 </a></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2">(slide 10)</font><font size="2">On a recent FISC slide I saw Red team (pentesting/hacking) among these future specializations.</font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2"> </font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2"> </font></font></font></p>
<p class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/security" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'security'." rel="tag">security</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/certification" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'certification'." rel="tag">certification</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/security%2Bcertification" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'security+certification'." rel="tag">security+certification</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/cissp" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'cissp'." rel="tag">cissp</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/cisa" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'cisa'." rel="tag">cisa</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/" title="See the Technorati tag page for ''." rel="tag"></a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/" title="See the Technorati tag page for ''." rel="tag"></a></p><img src="http://elamb.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=713&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elamb.org/security-certifications-dod-8570/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Store Passwords in a Secure Password Safe</title>
		<link>http://elamb.org/store-passwords-in-a-secure-password-safe/</link>
		<comments>http://elamb.org/store-passwords-in-a-secure-password-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb.security</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/elamb_security/elamb.org/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />
		<category><![CDATA[Certification/Security+/Basic Cryptography/Crypto Algor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elamb.org/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KeePass is a free/open-source password manager or safe to help you
manage your passwords in a secure way. Put all your passwords in one
database, which is locked with one master key or a key-disk. The
databases are encrypted using the best and most secure encryption
algorithms currently known (AES and Twofish).
read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KeePass is a free/open-source password manager or safe to help you<br />
manage your passwords in a secure way. Put all your passwords in one<br />
database, which is locked with one master key or a key-disk. The<br />
databases are encrypted using the best and most secure encryption<br />
algorithms currently known (AES and Twofish).</p>
<p><a href="http://keepass.sourceforge.net/">read more</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digg.com/software/Store_Passwords_in_a_Secure_Password_Safe">digg story</a></p>
<img src="http://elamb.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=122&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elamb.org/store-passwords-in-a-secure-password-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
